Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trend Micro Mascot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Deleted with a grain of salt.. Also, the SPAs pushing the article smell faintly of WP:SOCK to me. The Bushranger One ping only 05:07, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Trend Micro Mascot

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable advertising mascot - no significant coverage or claims of significance. Tried redirecting to Trend Micro several times, but constantly reverted by a series of SPAs. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 16:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is a para within Trend Micro at most. ...and as to the writing style! Andy Dingley (talk) 17:02, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Easy call.  There's absolutely no secondary coverage whatsoever.  Completely fails WP:GNG.  Reads like a sci-fi novel.  Msnicki (talk) 18:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The aticle has extensive writing problems and does not show any importance. I think it may qualify for speedy deletion under G11 or G1. Shakinglord:Kudos, Mailbox, ??? 18:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete with salt, so that it cannot be created without admin intervention. A redirect is not needed since topic is clearly advertising. The image is also a copyright violation so needs to go too. W Nowicki (talk) 19:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 21:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt to prevent further disruption. no evidence of standalone notability. LibStar (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.