Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trent Tepesz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per WP:SNOW.  Enigma msg  06:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Trent Tepesz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Absolutely no indication of notability (not even contextually), likely shameless self-promotion. Dahn (talk) 21:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete -A vagabond (self-described) who stole money to make one of the cheapest sounding movies I've ever heard of. And he is notable? Himalayan   21:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nothing spectacular about this guy. Nothing even notable. =O.o= -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:01, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Searches do not find anything that shows notability for this individual. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as G3 blatant hoax. The movie doesn't exist, the people named don't exist, the "Adult Entertainment Aficinado" doesn't exist, etc. The only Google hits for this made-up guy's supposed "cult hit" are two Wikipedia articles and the page hosting their made-up references, and virtually all the Google hits for him (about 50) are myspace, facebook, and message boards. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like it got declined, they're gonna let it ride. The tag that it's in AFD should give credence to that it's a hoax, and besides, if they put it back up, we can G4 it if need be. =) -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 15:52, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy wasn't declined, but removed by nonadmin for the (plainly incorrect) reason that you can't speedy an article at AFD. I don't follow this, since it clearly contradicts practice (eg, the article on the assocated porn movie hoax, which was speedied). Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I was unclear. I declined it because the AfD was in place, and it didn't look so blatant to me, but if this discussion demonstrates that it is, I've got no objection to a speedy delete per WP:SNOW. There is some advantage to letting it close here so it can be G4ed later. (By the way, anyone can decline a speedy, and my reasoning was unclear but not incorrect.) Shadowjams (talk) 22:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax or not, Trent Tepesz fails WP:V as well as WP:N. Searches come up with nothing besides two entries of dubious origin at the same blog site. • Gene93k (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.