Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trent Tresch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 23:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Trent Tresch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Most sources out there are from him building his own spacesuit. Article is very advertisement-heavy as-is. and are perhaps the most reliable sources, but even these are routine coverage of a contest, or local news coverage. Sam-2727 (talk) 02:28, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam-2727 (talk) 02:28, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sam-2727 (talk) 02:28, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam. I've blocked the creator for this. MER-C 13:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Seemingly has potential. Generally the primary sources are verified by secondary independent sources as outlined by WP:PSTS. Work has gained significant independent coverage: peer reviewed journal, TV show, national coverage , local news, magazine , etc. I agree that ad-heaviness could be altered or removed. Bioforce12 (talk) 21:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC) Sock strike -- The SandDoctor Talk 17:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a place you pay to get on and any article that has such actions in its history must be removed to preserve the integrity of Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment user: Johnpacklambert Agreed that paid-for spam should be removed to preserve integrity of wikipedia. However I'm unsure how to determine this here. The link WP:UPE goes to paid contribution disclosure. Did the user who posted the article say they were paid to create it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bioforce12 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)  Sock strike -- The SandDoctor Talk 17:32, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Took a shot at editing the article to support my view on keeping. Still believe the atricle WP:HASPOT and meets WP:GNG. Figured that it can always get changed back if needed. Bioforce12 (talk) 04:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC) Sock strike -- The SandDoctor Talk 17:32, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.