Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trenton Stokes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to David Duke. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Trenton Stokes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a person notable only as a minor fringe party candidate for vice-president of the United States. This is not an automatic notability freebie per WP:NPOL just because the person exists, but there's nowhere near enough reliable source coverage here to get him over WP:GNG in lieu as the only reference here at all is a raw table of the election results. As well, the article has been tagged for notability since 2010 without improvement -- literally the only edits that have taken place at all since then have been the addition and removal of the deprecated persondata template, and a category change. There's literally nothing here to make him encyclopedically notable for this. Bearcat (talk) 03:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:07, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:07, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge and redirect to David Duke. Apparently those who have contributed to this article have not been able to find much information about the subject, nor have I been able to do so in preparing this response. If reliable sources with more information about the subject are discovered later, the redirect can be turned back into a full article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete did not garner any significant coverage as a VP candidate.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:53, 25 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect per lack of substantial coverage in sources and above discussion. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to David Duke for lack of independent notability. A plausible search term, and the subject is already mentioned there. There's nothing to merge, so a straight redirect would be preferable. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.