Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trenzalore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Doctor Who planets. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Trenzalore

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article creator keeps recreating it, after a speedy delete, and after it has been repeatedly redirected to List of Doctor Who planets. It is written as an essay, with no reliable sources, and no notability meriting a standalone article. It seems that AfD is the only way this will be settled. First Light (talk) 19:43, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2011 (UTC)


 * enforce Redirect per nom. Jclemens (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Rebuttal
"Article creator keeps recreating it, after a speedy delete," It took me a long time to work through and create the content provided. After each deletion it took much of my time to recreate the article as it can be seen at this point. " it has been repeatedly redirected to List of Doctor Who planets" If you look at the reference you will see that while the information is identical to the link provide under planets that I retrieved this information from the tardis wiki website. Please click to following reference link to verify. "It is written as an essay, with no reliable sources, and no notability meriting a standalone article." The article is written on the basis for the outline of a movie script.This article was suppose to encourage those willing to add input on how a future doctor who episode should be structured. "it seems that AfD is the only way this will be settled." I am new to Wikipedia so i am unfamiliar with anachronisms "AfD" I going to assume that it stands for article for deletion. I see no basis for deletion given the arguments that i have present.

Awaiting your responce, Jerrydeanrsmith (talk) 22:10, 26 November 2011 (UTC)JerryDean Smith


 * Tardis Wiki is not a reliable source, as it is a wiki. Wikipedia should not be used to "encourage those willing to add input on how a future doctor who episode should be structured" as it is an encyclopedia, and is for factual information. I agree with the nominator, as it has no reliable sources and has no notability. I say it should be redirected to List of Doctor Who planets and protected. Doh5678 (talk) 23:44, 26 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Doctor Who planets and protect if necessary. Trenzalore has no real world notability to justify an article. What isn't copied from the Tardis Wiki appears to be an original WP:SYNTHESIS of information from unreliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment As nominator, my first choice would be to redirect it to List of Doctor Who planets. I've asked the article's creator, kindly and a few times, to read wikipedia policies - he doesn't seem to understand that Wikipedia isn't a place to solicit fan discussion about a theoretical television episode (or even professional collaboration on a real television episode). This should be a redirect, since it is apparently mentioned in the Doctor Who series and was already listed at List of Doctor Who planets. First Light (talk) 17:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect and protect- really no more needs to be said. Reyk  YO!  07:29, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above Stuartyeates (talk) 22:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.