Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treval Clifford Powers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Treval Clifford Powers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject is non-notable, and no sources are included. Olidog (talk) 20:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry! I didn't realise there was a special deletion method for unsourced BLPs.
 * The article isn't eligible for BLPprod as the subject died in 1997. Nthep (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know... I am rather new to this... Olidog (talk) 20:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Appears to be a major figure in concrete and cement studies. Frequently cited as "T.C. Powers". Called "the father of the modern science of cement-based materials", work called "pioneering", a representative figure for an era of cement technology, his work has itself been the subject of academic study.--Jahaza (talk) 20:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Another journal article on his work, another news story calling his work "pioneering".--Jahaza (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Thousands of cites on GS passes WP:Prof. Nominator is reminded of WP:Before. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC).
 * Keep. Passes both WP:PROF (for his well-cited work) and WP:GNG (for the material about him already linked above). —David Eppstein (talk) 00:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Very clear pass of WP:PROF. When nominating please bear in mind that we're concerned with all sources on a subject that exist, not just those that happen to be currently listed in the article (i.e. you should do some research yourself before nominating). –&#8239;Joe (talk) 10:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.