Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Henry (sports announcer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 03:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Trevor Henry (sports announcer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable person JDDJS (talk) 16:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The subject of this page is a well-known person worldwide, and is not limited to just within the League of Legends community. A considerable population would consider this person a very notable individual. Wikipedia masterr (talk) 16:49, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Then prove it with reliable sources. As of now, the article only has 2 sources, one of which is Facebook, which is not reliable. I did a Google News search for "Trevor Henry"+Quickshot and only got 4 results, none of them being recent. JDDJS (talk) 22:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable with no viable third-party sources. Google search turns up multiple individuals who share this name. sixty nine   • speak up •  01:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  04:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  04:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - My search didn't come up with anything to meet the WP:GNG. Sergecross73   msg me  04:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Clubjustin (talk) 12:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment the author, Wikipedia masterr, has been blocked as sock. Not saying we should end this discussion, but just feel that it should be noted. JDDJS (talk) 17:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Seeing as the article was created by the sock of a blocked user, this would fall under CSD G5. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, coverage in Red Bull, Rock, Paper, Shotgun, Engadget and Mail and Guardian. The fact that the article was created by a sockpuppet is a problem but it shouldn't be deleted solely based on that fact.--Prisencolin (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.