Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Koverko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Trevor Koverko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

He is not notable for either his company or his car accident. Henever actually played in the NHL, but if he is notable as a hockey player nonetheless, the article would need to be deleted in its present form and rewritten  DGG ( talk ) 00:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Has many unreliable sources, some primary, some passing, and one of them doesn't even mention him at all. 🌺Kori🌺  - ( @ ) 01:39, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment He is notable as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Ice_hockey

he has played for NHL: https://www.nhl.com/player/trevor-koverko-8471808 '':he has not. Look at the stats tab --those are not NHL teams) ''  DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Also as per advice of I've rewritten the Bio.

Also he is significantly covered by INC (for his company) : https://www.inc.com/kenny-kline/how-polymaths-founder-former-nhl-draft-pick-trevor-koverko-is-pioneering-a-new-frontier-in-cryptocurrency.html

Rattyhats (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete He is not remotely close to passing WP:NHOCKEY and I don't see enough elsewhere to satisfy the criteria needed for an article. Deadman137 (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep The subject has substantial coverage in reliable sources which are also secondary sources, therefore he passes WP:GNG.(Techwritar (talk) 22:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)) — Techwritar (talk • contribs) is blocked as a sock puppet of Felicia112 (talk • contribs). ST47 (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep He is notable as per WP:HOCKEY, and also passes WP:GNG.Achiiiiver (talk) 21:43, 15 April 2020 (UTC) — Achiiiiver (talk • contribs) is blocked as a sock puppet of Felicia112 (talk • contribs). ST47 (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject meets notability, a quick search through Google "News" up till the 10th page shows an amount of coverage from WP:GOODREFS including CNBC, Wall street jornal etc.--Bingrick (talk) 21:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC) — Bingrick (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Felicia112 (talk • contribs). ST47 (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, subject has enough coverage by reliable third party source, I'd advice the sources be improved on, as there are more that can be used on the page.--Felicia112 (talk) 21:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC) — Felicia112 (talk • contribs) is blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate. ST47 (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment The sudden influx of Keep votes looks fishy to me. Very similar-looking single-purpose accounts (plus one suspected of COI) whose only purpose seems to be voting in deletion discussions.—J. M. (talk) 00:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment The subject seem to meet WP:GNG, I have made a couple of changes on the content and added more sources as references.Sanvox (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC) — Sanvox (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Felicia112 (talk • contribs). ST47 (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep There are multiple sources covering the subject from its career as a hockey player to corporate life, Keep as per WP:BIODunkankin (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC) — Dunkankin (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Felicia112 (talk • contribs). ST47 (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment It really looks like we're dealing with sock puppetry or meat puppetry here. The single-purpose accounts adding the Keep votes look all the same (very similar user pages, very similar, almost blank edit histories). The last Keep was added by a new account that looks just like the previous accounts with the Keep votes (and the arguments are not convincing). It really looks like deliberate manipulation. Could someone please have a look?—J. M. (talk) 19:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * it looks so much like it that there's I see little point in even bothering doing a checkuser, though if another checkuser wants to run it, I have no objection.  DGG ( talk ) 20:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment The crypto junk needs to be removed. But is he notable enough as a former ice hockey player? — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 11:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.