Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor M. Fuller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Trevor M. Fuller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local commissioner. Was de-prodded without rationale. Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass WP:GNG, and they clearly don't pass WP:NPOL. Also, username might indicate either an WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY or WP:COI issue.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Likely CV-type article for non-notable local politician. Does not pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG.  All significant independent coverage is WP:ROUTINE.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 06:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL as non-notable local politician and also fails WP:BASIC AusLondonder (talk) 06:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. County commissioner is not a level of office that confers an automatic WP:NPOL pass on every person who holds it — a county commissioner can clear the bar if he can be sourced over WP:GNG to a broad range of media coverage beyond just the expected level of local coverage, but he is not automatically entitled to an article just because he exists. As well, the article was created by "Meckcommish", so there's a clear conflict of interest. And making claims about how big and important the county is does not reify into an inclusion freebie for the county commissioners either — the article is about him, not about the county, so notability has to be shown by coverage of him. There's simply not enough sourcing, or enough substance, here to get him past our requirements. Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete County commissioners are not default notable, and the attempts to build up the importance of Mecklenberg County in the article do not change that.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.