Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trexit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Trexit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highly recentistic neologism; no in-depth, significant coverage of the term itself that supports a claim to notability. Prod declined by article creator. Neutralitytalk 16:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


 * See also the related Articles for deletion/Trumponomics, created by a different editor. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Poorly sourced article. I suspect we will see a lot of terms based on "Brexit" in coming years; we don't need an article for all of them. Instaurare (talk) 23:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete It's not even entirely clear what this neologism means from the references. The Fortune article implies it is a Trump presidency renegotiating trade deals; Arianna Huffington used it to refer to the possibility of the GOP removing Trump from the ticket (presumably during the convention, judging from the date of the article.) It's pretty meaningless when there isn't even a definition in the article itself. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:24, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete a WP:NEO wannabe for which sufficient sourcing does not yet exist.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:35, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW delete. Pinterest may be the strongest source on the page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.