Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trey Ebanks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 08:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Trey Ebanks

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. HeinzMaster (talk) 22:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/ talk ¦ contribs \ 19:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Caribbean. HeinzMaster (talk) 22:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep User has nominated ~25 articles for deletion in ~20 minutes. Imposisble that a WP:BEFORE was done for each, and the nominations appear to be in bad faith. NemesisAT (talk) 22:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per . I found sources which show he is notable in Cayman like among other sources. In addition, he is a young 8-time capped  international with an ongoing career. I look at the other sports WikiProjects and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I wrote this another 30 are probably deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - has clearly decided all players that play for national teams he does not feel confer notability are those which should be deleted. The usual revisionism and elitism around notability in sports Zanoni (talk) 08:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. The source above is good but not enough on its own. GiantSnowman 15:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.