Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trey Guidotti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. with salt joe deckertalk to me 18:56, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Trey Guidotti

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article has been speedily deleted and recreated several times; I am bringing it to AfD for broader discussion. The subject of this article does not appear to meet any part of the notability criteria at WP:BIO, as the sources are not independent of the subject and the those linking to the subject's product line appear promotional, as well. VQuakr (talk) 17:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 17:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Surely, if he were a celebrity, he'd be mentioned in a news article somewhere. Pburka (talk) 18:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zero hits in Google News. Not notable. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:29, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing found at Google News. No Reliable Sources at Google. No Reliable Sources cited at the article, just things like YouTube, and self-referential material from a company which distributes one of his products. If the article has been recreated several times as VQuakr says, consider Salting it as well. --MelanieN (talk) 19:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * A celeb known for his photography, the article claims. I hadn't heard of him myself, but I must confess that my eyes do tend to glaze over when I encounter the C word. I put that aside and dutifully went to his website. There was a link to his photos. This is it. What do we see? No mention of any photobook by Guidotti or exhibition by Guidotti, let alone any critical commentary on the photographic oeuvre of Guidotti. We do see that Trey Guidotti seems to love both Trey Guidotti and people expressing their love for Trey Guidotti. Ahhh. Delete, for the fourth time. Four times are more than enough, so salt. -- Hoary (talk) 02:09, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete the article was previously deleted three times, the last of which came after I tagged CSD A7 and G11. Subject hasn't received significant coverage. Sp33dyphil  "Ad astra" 04:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - "He is a Celebrity known for his product line and photography" What evidence is there that he is a celebrity with limited/no coverage in Google? (Flickr and YouTube are not reliable sources) 11coolguy12 (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BIO absent coverage in reliable sources; claims to WP:ENTERTAINER etc. with the music video and the book are...weak is a nice way of putting it. I see that this has been deleted several times; at least now that it's going to be deleted in AfD we'll be able to G4 it. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.