Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trey Kennedy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 04:21, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Trey Kennedy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable youtuber. Fails MUSICBIO MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep as has reliable sources significant coverage in sources such as The Today Show, Christian Post, The Tennessian, Oklahomian and others, all already referenced in the article. Also he was scheduled for a 15 state tour of the US before it was cancelled due to the pandemic which would have been a claim to pass WP:NMUSIC imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * @User:Atlantic306 so you think that the oklahomian article titled Oklahoma teenagers realize hoop dreams with title win written in 2007 as a small news report about a teenager team winning a basketball match, which mentions the subject of this article by name only once, and that too just in the lineup......is a reliable source giving significant, indepth coverage, to the subject of this article whose claim to fame is as a TikTok star? MistyGraceWhite (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:14, 12 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * The other coverage detailed above passes WP:GNG imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, the article in the Oklahoman is just a passing mention, but the other sources cited in the article are clearly enough to pass both GNG and BLP1E. Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep--article has 32 references; he meets GNG.Epiphyllumlover (talk) 23:00, 23 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.