Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tri-State Bigfoot Study Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 17:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Tri-State Bigfoot Study Group

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ORG. No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. One self-generated mention on a local newspaper website does not satisfy WP:ORG. --Alvestrand (talk) 17:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, no notability whatsoever. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, Don Keating's group, and he's a notorious Bigfoot personality. If you feel the newspaper article is a fraud, go to the library and microscan it yourself. SeanFromIT (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I call on Don Keating's notability. --Alvestrand (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No notability, agree with nom --mboverload @ 06:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability. ThuranX (talk) 07:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. The references are to the groups own angelfire site and a bigfoot fansite, not reliable sources. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 09:08, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is not gained by tanential involvement of barely-notable individuals. No evidence of non-trivial independent coverage. Guy (Help!) 07:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.