Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triacontatetragon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A move can be proposed. (non-admin closure)  J 947(c) (m) 18:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Triacontatetragon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Google search shows that this fails WP:GNG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Being constructible is an unusual property but not enough to provide independent notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. There seems to be at least a little mention of this, here, for example.  And if not a keep, maybe at least merge into a new section at heptadecagon since it's fairly closely related.  --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 13:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's a simple topic, 34-sided polygon.  Basic math facts about it are presented, without sources which is okay because the facts are not contested, are probably 100% okay.  If someone wants to contest the facts, that can be done by tagging challenging for sources.  Wikipedia is a reference source;  this covers a basic encyclopedic topic. -- do  ncr  am  18:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment – a GS and Google Books search for "34-gon" turns up a smattering of results (I noticed    ), so the topic seems worth discussing somewhere, maybe in a section at heptadecagon.  XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 04:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep a merge would be ideal, but I don't see a good target. Keep is the next-best option. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 19:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. The original stub had lots of formatting issues and trivia. Bearian (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Shouldn't it be "triacontakaitetragon"? The "kai" is missing. Largoplazo (talk) 16:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think it's cool that it's constructable.  Somewhat more seriously, there's enough in the article that merging it (and others like it) into something like list of polygons would be unwieldy.  And, even more seriously, this is math.  We need more math (and less crap about porn stars, pokémon, and pop culture).  -- RoySmith (talk) 17:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.