Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triad C64 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 13:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Triad C64
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has been nominated for deletion before, but the article remains unimproved, with unverified original research. In addition to the questionable nature of the article, the notability is a little on the weak side. Medic007 (talk) 14:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Piracy-related deletion discussions.  —Medic007 (talk) 14:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N. At the first AFD many claimed it was notable because they'd heard of it themselves (see WP:ITEXISTS and WP:IKNOWIT), but the fact remains that there aren't any independent reliable sources which discuss Triad C64 - at least not on the first few pages of a Google search. Una LagunaTalk 15:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this group. Joe Chill (talk) 21:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comments --Teancum (talk) 14:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.