Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trialphaco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   G11 by Lectonar, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 12:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Trialphaco

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Page created 18 July 2008, with no significant development since apart from being tagged as orphaned, unreferenced, unlinked and needing copy editing. Apparently, no one cares to sort out any of these, perhaps because no one can. This appears to be another example of using Wikipedia as a directory for companies that have no notability beyond a Wikepedia entry! Only remote claim to notability is that the company "witnessed tremendous growth.....within a short period" which is a claim hat can be made by every start up company. Emeraude (talk) 22:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:N and WP:ORG. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 22:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Blatant advertising. Could have been CSD'd. Chaldor (talk) 23:08, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. In this case, it's not worth retaining. rootology  ( C )( T ) 23:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged for speedy deletion as blatant advertising. Alexius08 (talk) 04:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.