Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triapeirogonal tiling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 18:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Triapeirogonal tiling

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject is not notable. As with the now deleted pentaapeirogonal tiling, there is no mention of this tiling in either of the cited sources, a search yields no additional sources, and the article appears to be entirely original research. AquitaneHungerForce (talk) 16:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 17:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reason as my opinion in Articles for deletion/Pentaapeirogonal tiling: nothing in here is about this specific tiling. It is purely original research based on the general properties of uniform hyperbolic tilings. Perhaps we could justify it as WP:CALC if it were merely a line in another article, stated without the use of neologisms, but that cannot be the basis for existence of an entire article. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as argued above. What we need is an article that explains the general workings of hyperbolic tilings as well as possible, not these neologistic, OR-ful fragments. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 02:15, 25 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.