Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribal Council (Survivor) (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Tribal Council (Survivor)

 * — (View AfD)

The whole page is smaller than the tribal council section on the main Survivor page It was originally said it was to shorten the main article, but it doesn't shorten it at all. There is also not even a link to it on the main Survivor page. TeckWizTalk Contribs@ 14:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect without merge to Survivor (TV series), already covered throughly in main article --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 22:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per the decision from the same AFD two months ago unless the nominator can point to something that has changes. meshach 03:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete First of all, to reply to Mesach, there was no decision in the last AfD that you cited; the result was no consensus so it is perfectly valid for someone to nominate it again. And furthermore, that AfD had very few votes and was arguably closed prematurely when it should have been relisted.  That being said, this is unnecessary.  The article is a stub so there is no reason for it to be separate from the main article as it doesn't help to shorten it which was its intended purpose in the first place, as the nominator mentioned.  We don't need articles for individual aspects of television shows, it's unnecessary when that information can just as easily be included in the main article for that show which is also a more efficient way of doing it anyway. --The Way 08:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Gah, Delete as totally redundant per nom. The notion was maybe good; the implementation, hopelessly bad.  But delete without prejudice to recreate, in case someone later decides they actually do want to split the info from the main article (and shrink the main article in the process).   Xtifr tälk 11:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.