Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribal Fusion

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS, so keep. -Splash talk 21:41, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Tribal Fusion
Appears to me to be an advertisement. Numbers do not have reliable source. rob 06:13, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This company is responsible for a large majority of "pop-under" ads foisted on us web surfers, and are a boil on the buttocks of humanity. This is little more than advertising. Al 12:52, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, advertising. 109,999,995 of those ad-viewers swore at whomever foisted an unwanted pop-under upon them, without knowing the name Tribal Fusion.  The company probably won't attain notability even if Elliot Spitzer or the feds bust them.  Barno 14:44, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. It's not "little more than advertising," it is advertising. --Jacqui M Schedler 15:55, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising. --Carnildo 22:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Definitely NOT a speedy. Simple statement of facts that establish notability is not necessarily advertisement.  Statement of facts that establish notability can be used in advertisements, but that does not mean these facts and the company the facts are about are an advertisement here.   Un  focused  00:33, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep precisely because the company is responsible for the large majority of "pop-under" ads, and cleanup. ElBenevolente 02:00, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup: 10 billion monthly advertisements means that this company will be important for anyone studying Internet Advertising. Seems notable and verifiable.  -- Creidieki 02:47, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I had a go at cleaning it up and removed two of the "reviews" that were little more than reprints of their sales pitch. Still needs more work. --GraemeL (talk) 11:06, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable. Kappa 17:39, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.