Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribal Ink


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete both. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Tribal Ink

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Band whose only claim to fame is supposed MySpace popularity; article also claims that the band received some sort of attention when their music was mislabeled on filesharing services. All of this is unsourced. Whether or not any of the information in the article is actually accurate, there's nothing that establishes any kind of notability. Ibaranoff24 (talk) 04:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page:


 * Delete both No third-party reliable sources in sight. Furthermore, both subjects seem to fail WP:GNG. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 06:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can find no in-depth coverage for this band; does not appear to meet any other criteria of WP:BAND.  Gongshow  Talk 01:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for album article / Weak delete for band article. Like Willoughby and Gongshow I can also find no useful sources. For the album Surrounded by Freaks, we're going to need much more reason for notability than getting confused with someone else in a file-sharing error. For the band Tribal Ink, there might be reason for notability due to appearance on little-known reality show/TV contest, if the creator of the article adds more detail. Otherwise, the case for keeping the article would still be weak. For example, see the discussion at Articles for deletion/Quinton Caruthers. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 08:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.