Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribune Media Services


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep; drive-by PR resulted in the nomination, resolved by reversion to last known good version. Nominator requested and non-admin closure.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:53, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Tribune Media Services

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOT advert User:CorporateM 01:49, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Highly disagree; article is neutral and describes company's main products solely in list form and text and can certainly be sourced. One of the two big TV listings providers in the United States and one of the largest newspaper syndicates around. No real reason presented for deletion besides throwing in a WP: policy with no rationale. Not for that, but drive-by PR resulted in article getting promo-speaked into a stub. Corrected quickly and no problems existed with version I saw when I listed my rationale.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:30, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Huh, someone re-wrote it 30 minutes after nomination. This is the version I originally nominated. Current looks ok I guess. User:CorporateM 02:51, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the nominated version looks terrible (whoever 'updated' it pretty much made their company look terrible; the new update was restored from an earlier revision). Did you want a NAC on this or should we let the nomination play out?  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:06, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know what a NAC is, but I don't see any reason to AfD it anymore. Guess I should have looked at the edit history. User:CorporateM 03:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, it happens occasionally. I didn't even know the content was changed so abruptly. NAC=non-admin closure of the nomination, which I'm doing now.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:53, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.