Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribune for the Retarded Monkey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. DS 14:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Tribune for the Retarded Monkey
Article about what seems to be a non-notable tech website. (When I visited the site, only two people were logged on the forums, including myself as a guest). I originally speedy deleted it, but the author of the original page posted the following on the talk page. I still don't think it's notable enough for inclusion, but out of courtesy to the author, I thought perhaps it merits a debate. Jasmol 00:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC)


 * from the author Hello, We appreciate your concerns with the safety and protection of Wikipedia, but we're a little upset about our entries and how they have been reacted to. We can assure you and the rest of the Wikipedia Counter-Vandalism Team that we wish no harm. "Tribune for the Retarded Monkey" or "TRM" is in no way meant to be offensive to anyone. It is also not 'nonsense' but as the first ammendment states, you are entitled to your opinion. All we wish to do, is to reach to a broader audience so we could obtain an increase in publicity. If this violates any of Wikipedia's rules, we apologize sincerely. Thank You. -The TRM Forum-


 * Delete as per Jasmol. I got no hits for a search for "Tribune for the Retarted Monkey" see  so verifiability problems. Having two people in the forum indicates that it doesn't meet our notability requirements outlined in our Websites guidelines. Capitalistroadster 02:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are plenty of Internet venues for generating publicity.  I wish you well with them. Durova 02:45, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not the place for this. Reyk 05:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable --supers 06:09, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn --Timecop 06:09, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Skrewler 06:10, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Femmina 06:13, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipdedia are not to be used for self-promotion per What Wikipedia is not. Good luck anyway! Edwardian 06:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, Edwardian. Dottore So 08:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no not notable. (cute name though ^_^) --Depakote 12:41, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete you have to worry about an article that starts out with: *This is not a joke* --- Astrokey44 12:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.