Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribute to the Troops


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. Davnel03 21:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Decision upheld given votes and time elapsed, user instructed about non-admins closing debates, and any editor closing debates they have participated in.  Dei zio  talk 22:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

WWE Tribute to the Troops

 * Delete: This is a normal RAW except it is either done in Iraq or Afghanistan. Davnel03 19:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Should only be a note on the Raw page. -- James   Duggan  21:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per previous deletions of similar articles. Croctotheface 00:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Recurring but not inherently notable by itself. A section in the raw article for certain though. NegroSuave 05:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Should be on a wrestling Wiki instead, and just a note on the Raw article here. RobJ1981 06:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Aaru Bui  DII 09:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Soft Keep I don't really see anything wrong with this article. Infact over a period of time (a few years) it would get bigger and look a better article. I shall add a link to it on the WWE Raw page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Govvy (talk • contribs) 12:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC).
 * Comment It doesn't matter how the article looks.  It is a special event raw that doesn't deserve it's on page. It deserves mention on the RAW page.
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge with World Wrestling Entertainment's section on programming. This is not notable enough to stand alone, but there should be some mention somewhere, and the section on WWE programming is most appropriate. The "match results" should be discarded, however. B.Wind 21:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.