Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trickle attack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:13, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Trickle attack
A search for "Trickle attack" spam on Google shows only 10 unique results. Interestingly, "trickle attack" itself shows 71 and a review of some of the additional 61 websites citations for trickle attack do not concern spam, but discuss the use of trickle attacks in warfare and against firewalls. I therefore nominate this entry for deleltion because it is a narrow definition of a non-notable neologism. Madman 13:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - someone is trying to coin a neologism here. Cyde Weys votetalk 14:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pn. Dan 16:08, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete as nn neologism. Stifle 14:34, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.