Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tricon Residential


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 07:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Tricon Residential

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article by WP:UPE. Does not meet WP:NCORP since sources are largely WP:ROUTINE coverage. Sawada Katsuo (talk) 06:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Nominator has been blocked for spamming. I am not closing this nomination so that it can be evaluated on its merits (or lack thereof) - just because they are a spammer doesn't mean they're wrong. MER-C 17:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG. gnews reveals mainly press release type articles. LibStar (talk) 04:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Company has a lot of online news coverage. A deep look reveals coverage in Wall Street Journal, The Star, BNN Bloomberg, San Antonio Express-News, The Tennessean, Nashville Post and Forbes. Apopolips (talk) 00:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep A simple google search shows articles in reliable sources. The article itself already cites many news sources covering Tricon such as The Globe and Mail, Financial Post and other Canadian media.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.