Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trigger and Jim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Although the debate is hard to judge, there would appear to be a weakish consensus that the article is not telling the whole truth in some parts. -Splash talk 01:24, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Trigger and Jim
Hoax. Hoax hoax hoax hoax hoax hoax hoax hoax hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooax. Did I mention hoax? From details such as the precise minute of the band's formation, to the fact that their "countless classic albums" reached the heady heights of #32 on the Liechtenstein charts, to their controversial Albania tour during which they became addicted to heroin and popsicles, there is no doubt whatsoever. Hoax. Kill them with fire - oh, and their article too. DS 16:17, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - I believe this is a hoax, despite what DS says. --Outlander 16:26, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete don't listen to DS and Outlander. Careful research reveals that this is actually a hoax. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  16:55, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * As a founding member of Trigger and Jim, I'm highly offended by your-- oh, who am I fooling? Delete.  Friday (talk) 18:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Are you trying to say none of you remember the seminal Acid House Rock album I'm Just a Wikihoax by Trigger and Jim?--Isotope23 18:29, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Strongly disagree with all of the above. Careful analysis has led me to conclude that the article is, in fact, a completely sincere, genuine and valuable hoax. Delete. TheMadBaron 19:32, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * All previous voters are sockpuppets and extreme deletionists. All contrafactual bands are necessary for comprehensive coverage in a truly great encyclopedia.  My computer program verifes that this article is, despite their wild charges, in fact a valid, real hoax.  Delete.  Barno 20:06, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep! - oops, typo. Delete! Not a hoax, tho, just a joke. A hoax would try harder. -- BD2412 talk 20:52, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah, but a joke would be funnier. No, this is definitely more hocular than jocular. TheMadBaron 10:00, 22 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Hoax 100 Percent Delete --Aranda56 01:54, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Note - if you guys think this is a hoax I wish you would just say it straight out and stop beating around the bush. --Outlander 13:55, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Guys, really, look into your research- I've been doing minutes upon minutes of painstaking research at my iBook, and I have concluded with 100% confidence that this is, indeed, a pure hoax. You may all sleep sound tonight. --WikiFanaticTalk Contribs 23:47, 23 September 2005 (CDT)
 * Delete. Lacks references, and I harbor the suspicion that some of the content might be of a somewhat dubious nature, to be honest. -- grm_wnr Esc  04:50, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.