Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triggernometry (podcast)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Konstantin Kisin. Tone 08:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Triggernometry (podcast)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Triggernometry is a non-notable podcast. Three of the six sources are links to the podcast, the Telegraph article is not independent due to it being written by a guest of the podcast; the Express (article) is a non-reliable source; and the American Thinker appears unreliable. Further, none of these sources constitute significant coverage of the podcast itself, separate to the topic of the host, who may well merit his own article. Search for reliable and independent coverage has been fruitless, and there are clearly people invested in making this article worthy of remaining who have also failed to find significant sourcing.

As such, the article as it currently stands has been a mess of edit warring over opinions that can't be backed up by reliable sourcing, and only serves to advertise the podcast. If this podcast at some point in the future gains notability, it should certainly be restored, but very little information will be lost in its deletion now that could not be replaced at a future time. — Hazzzzzz12 (talk ) 05:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The edit warring seems to have stopped. I think an understanding has been reached. — Jschanna7 (talk ) 00:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks but I hope it’s clear that the issue with the page is less about warring and more that there is warring because sources are too scarce, and few statements (probably all true and good faith) can be  backed up by editors. — Hazzzzzz12  (talk ) 03:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi @Hazzzzzz12, hope you're well. It looks like Triggernometry has been reviewed in sources that Wikipedia regards as reliable, such as https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/revisionist-history-malcolm-gladwell-podcast-review-malcolm-gladwell-cvcbmmp3g. Does this now meet the criteria for Triggernometry to have its own wiki page? Jschanna7 (talk) 20:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete The sources that are out there seem to focus more on the creator of the podcast or its guest stars, nothing is really about the work itself.★Trekker (talk) 13:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Konstantin Kisin: Barely found anything about the podcast. Sources in the article talk about the podcast's activities and not the podcast itself. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Konstantin Kisin. Podcasts can be difficult to write about because they don't get as much detailed attention in reliable sources as other forms of media such as film, television, or novels. That largely seems to be the issue here with passing mentions to the podcast in sources not doing enough to assert notability. Richard Nevell (talk) 17:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.