Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trimark Pictures


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn) (non-admin closure)  Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  10:08, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Trimark Pictures

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a video-game company lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable sources neither does meet WP:NCORP nor WP:GNG standard. Anupmehra - Let's talk!  09:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you mean video/gaming or did you mean it as videogames as in just the videogame arm? The way it's phrased in the argument here is a little confusing, as I mostly associate them with movies. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Damn! I'm not sure where did I read a company that made video-games, it doesn't appear now. I just read it again, and find it was a production house, investing to make and distribute movies. It probably should be notable. However, I remember googling the subject (tab still open) up to first 5 pages, finding nothing substantial. Someone at least, for the AfD sake would take the task to find sources and improve the present article. I'm open to withdraw this nomination if multiple reliable sources with substantial coverage of the subject shown. For now, I need a nap for myself. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  09:48, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm finding a bit, although you'll generally have to search for just "Trimark" since that's how they were referred to because of the multiple, multiple titles used for them. I am finding reference of them in places such as this Rutgers University Press book, but it's a lot to wade through. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:51, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * We should also look for Vidmark, another name the company identified as. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:54, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I've found enough sources to help the subject to reach WP:NCORP standard. "Vidmark" as a keyword worked! . Withdrawing nomination and closing afd as speedy close.  Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  10:08, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.