Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trina

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. &mdash; Xezbeth 20:14, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Trina
DONT FUCK WIF WHITE DAWG. BROWARD REPRESENT! THIS ARTICLE IS NON NOTABLE AND DOES NOT PASS WP: MUSIC BrowardDon 02:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Um, keep, does pass WP:MUSIC. Also, probable sockpuppet nomination. Shiri &mdash; Talk 02:33, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep article establishes notability... and your edits look awfully similar to User:BrowardBulldawg... Hmmm... I wonder... Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions 02:39, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep nominations by this user. Just an attempt to disrupt Wikipedia. See many other nominations by this user on this page. --Tabor 03:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WikiMusic Guidelines. The nominator should read the guidelines about not disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. Capitalistroadster 05:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep does pass WikiMusic guidelines. - Mgm|(talk) 08:50, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. As much as I hate rap, this article belongs on Wikipedia. Aecis 13:47, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Damn it, we really, really, really, really need to get all these Broward* users banned for life.  This is unbelievable. jglc | t | c 16:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep of course and as for BrowardDon well, delete him.  hydnjo talk 18:54, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable person.--Kross 22:45, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .