Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Catholic School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  03:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Trinity Catholic School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject of article does not meet notability requiremenst of WP:LOCAL Nv8200p talk 13:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:SCHOOL requires the multiple nontrivial external sources, which are not in the article, and which I'm not finding, either. Creator is welcome to produce sources to change my mind. -FisherQueen (Talk) 14:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:SCHOOL, WP:V. Terence Ong 17:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:SCHOOL is not actually a current policy (as it was not adopted). Although I agree that school articles ought to show evidence of notability, most schools do have their own articles at present, and it would seem unfair to deny an article to this one. And there's a substantial body of Wikipedians who argue that schools are inherently notable (although I'm not among them). Walton monarchist89 19:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Looking at Watch/schoolwatch/Schools_for_deletion_archive, a number of school articles have been deleted due to failure of WP:N. Also, I have prodded a number of school articles whose deletions went through uncontested.  If this school article is deleted, it won't be alone at all.  (By the way, I doubt very much that most schools have their own articles.)  Pan Dan 20:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete because there is no sign of non-trivial external coverage which we could use to write a Wikipedia article. Checked Google news archives and even local papers in Lexis-Nexis.  This is not a surprise though, because most schools wouldn't pass WP:N.  Pan Dan 20:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If kept, should be moved to Trinity Catholic School (Lewiston) and the redirect either deleted or made into a disambiguation page, as there appear to be others. Pan Dan 20:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above arguments to that effect. Non-notable. Soltak | Talk 23:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. As usual, no evidence of notability. Just for once, give me a reason to keep a school article, please. It's not enough that the school exists and teaches students - all schools do that: just, please, show me a case where the school is actually doing something that distinguishes it from its peers ! ( Rant over. ) WMMartin 14:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pan Dan. -- Butseriouslyfolks 20:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no notability, no sources, and if WP:SCHOOL were policy, it wouldn't meet it. Dismas|(talk) 14:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.