Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Records Hong Kong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 20:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Trinity Records Hong Kong

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems to fail notability criteria for labels. Aside from the connection between metal and Hong Kong being somewhat novel, Trinity Records was somewhat short-lived and had a small output of 34 releases. WP:BEFORE yielded nothing about the label, and the dead CNN link was perhaps more about the bands than the label? Geschichte (talk) 08:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: At least one version of the CNN article can be found in the Internet Archive. The subheadline reads „A look at how Hong Kong label Trinity Records is helping Asian metal come of age“. I think it's more about the label than the bands... By the way: I am the author and, no surprise at all, I'd like to keep the article. --Herr P. schreibt (talk) 19:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 20:06, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find anything better than that CNN source that we're discussing. That source fails WP:ORGIND as most of the content is from comments made by the label's founder. There is a lack of truly independent analysis of this label from people completely independent from it. Please ping me if anyone does manage to dig up sources that satisfy ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:19, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.