Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinket Rec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Trinket Rec

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable group of musicians, not supported by any references. (Notes are links to Wikipedia, not references.) Robert McClenon (talk) 02:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:NCerealKillerYum (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing applicably better for the needed notability. I myself patrolled this and certainly questioned it. SwisterTwister   talk  03:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. This clearly qualifies for speedy deletion in accordance with WP:CSD. The article contains no credible claims of importance, there's no evidence that any of the WP:BAND criteria are met, and the article even states that the band and the record label are up-and-coming. You don't get an article on Wikipedia if you're up-and-coming. You must have already arrived. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not establish any notability, article is purely promotional. I'm tempted to speedy delete this if further speedy delete votes appear. J I P  &#124; Talk 21:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - No claim of significance, and it's clearly spam. GABHello! 21:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.