Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinstod


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 16:29, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Trinstod

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

"Presumed to be" a game. That and the Youtube link and I've got almost the entire article in this AfD. Fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. &mdash; Coren (talk) 03:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete based on the A1 rationale. Erechtheus 03:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC) In light of the changes, this is no longer speedy material. Delete due to lack of notability per WP:WEB. Erechtheus 01:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. --TeaDrinker 23:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * PLEASE KEEP I have worked considerably on the entry. --EnochHeath 01:15, 17 October 2007 (GMT)
 * Comment This is really not a wishlist discussion. While the effort you took to make a good article is really appreciated, it's still unclear what this really is, and thus it fails WP:N Additionally, lots of the stuff in the article is OR. You might want to consider copying the article to your user page, and once it is confirmed that this is an ARG, it can be put back and expanded (and all the OR cruft removed). Note that I follow the unfolding of the mystery myself, but this has no place on WP --Darkstar 15:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I feel that due to content of video 2, and its use on Unfiction that this can be confirmed as an ARG. Under the guidelines for notibility, its states "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" Does its coverage on Unfiction not fulfill this requirement; Unfiction is an established forum for ARG content, reputable also. The non biased style of the article surely is documenting part of a growing trend among thousands of internet users. ARG's and Virals seem to be taking off and surely any entry helping to document that rise is useful. Please forgive my ignorance as this is my first 'real' attempt at WP. I would be happy to edit/remove the 'OR Cruft' if you could let me know what OR is.--EnochHeath 19:48, 17 October 2007 (GMT)
 * OR means Original Research. See WP:OR for the guideline. And as I said, if it really turns out to be an ARG, you can always add the article back later (with the relevant links to sites confirming the ARG status). --Darkstar 09:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per TeaDrinker, WP:NOT, and as likely OR. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 02:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

As a fan of ARG's I have begun following this game. It seems due to content on the second video that this 'is' an ARG and so I worked hard to compile a good Wiki for it. Many thanks, Enoch Heath.


 * DELETE: However real this "game" might be, it is not notable.  It appears to have existed for one week. -Tux256ac 19:23, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.