Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trio (1997 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Shawn Teller (talk) 12:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Trio (1997 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLAR in December 2022 that was contested; original rationale was due to lack of notability. See also Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 12. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 09:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and South Korea. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 09:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Because Park Chan-wook is such an important film director, there are a significant number of news and other articles that reference this film in terms of being "painfully inaccessible" or being an early film of his that "tanked." Because Park Chan-wook is such a significant director and this film is frequently cited as a misstep in the building of his career, I believe the film qualifies for notability under the Wikipedia film notability's inclusionary criteria, which states that a film is notable if it "features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of their career." --SouthernNights (talk) 17:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per SouthernNights. 176.88.80.31 (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per SouthernNights. Dotoilage (talk) 16:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.