Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triodent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Triodent

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

advertising, and lack of notability ,since the references are press releases and very specialized awards  DGG ( talk ) 22:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete As per nom. Advertorial which fails GNG and SIGCOV. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 03:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:33, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as corporate spam and due to lack of notability. Fails GNG, SIGCOV and CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:48, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as thoroughly promotional and thus excluded from Wikipedia by the WP:NOTADVERTISING policy. Rentier (talk) 10:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.