Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TripHobo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

TripHobo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Nothing significant but another startup company. For being in Wikipedia need to be much more significant than this. Else Wikipedia will become a Startup directory. 1000s of startups happens every day. Just another one. Article is written only for company promotional and advertising purposes. References are very poor in terms of coverage they provide. No depth coverage by independent media for its notability but script given to large media group. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria for companies. Once in a lifetime coverage in popular media is not enough to be part of its significance. or being released as press or promotional exercises. Light2021 (talk) 10:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Being a startup company in the news may satisfy WP:GNG, but Wikipedia is not interested in a company with potential.  We have no deadline, so we can wait.  If this company pans out, it will continue to attract attention from reliable sources.  Fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER.  Articles about companies require neutral coverage, that is exactly what WP:PROMO says, and this means that we should include coverage of why a company's products are attractive to the rest of the world.  Unscintillating (talk) 01:38, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.