Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triple Accounting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:05, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Triple Accounting

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This appears to be a neologism of uncertain notability, added as part of several edits by the same individual to highlight the work of one particular individual (Michel de Kemmeter). Ckatz chat spy  18:33, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Ckatz, don't know if I'm doing right commenting here, but here I go asking your advice, as at first was marked as requiring linking to the article. The individual is a writer in Economics and Human Development in Belgium and had one of his books as best seller in the country (as a matter of notability). Actually the subject of the article is being worked with companies, but as well with the Belgium government for assessment of human knowledge to multiple puporses, like for the development of the Jobs of Tomorrow for older people in part of new's Economy paradigm. Some considerations on improvements to make it work? Brunogiacomelli (talk) 21:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I met the guy a couple of time, in different conference, The UHDR.net Network is not one man project, there are many persons connected to it. I believe here (in Belgium) the concept of intangible assets and liabilities is getting more and more visibility. Triple accounting is a nice concept and tool being used by more and more companies. I know there have few article published and a Ted talk. I will try to find out some links and more references. Olivier C (talk) 12:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: a research and concept in accounting in research .... that aims to add Emotional Balance and Knowledge Balance to traditional balance sheets in business, enabling wider view of value in companies.  Does this mean that I can go to a bank and ask for a loan, and put up my emotional well-being as collateral?  This would appear to be original research and a non-notable neologism. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.