Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triple Science


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to GCSE Science. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 03:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Triple Science

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This appears to be WP:SYNTH and possible WP:OR of various sources unrelated to the topic. I do not see in a sampling of the sources any actual mention of the purported subject. It's also heavy on Primary documents and citations such as nature are to listing of articles on nature.com Slywriter (talk) 21:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Redirect or outright deletion? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Science,  and Biology. Slywriter (talk) 21:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Science education in England which contains substantially the same content but better written and with greater context. NeverRainsButPours (talk) 17:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as nommed. (I think this is too generic to make sense as a redir, although I could live with that also. In which case, I'd rather point it to General Certificate of Secondary Education.) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Recasting my !vote to redirect to GCSE Science. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:52, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * I think redirect makes the most sense here as a valid term; I don't think there's anything here worth saving or notable on its own. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 01:18, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, as the notability is not established. Out of the 27 refs, ~15 relate to GCSE, and many of them overall are to describe the meaning of a topic (e.g. the ref in Organization is a dictionary definition). It's something that I would consider a course catalog (i.e. WP:NOTCATALOG). SWinxy (talk) 02:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to GCSE Science. Current Triple Science page is essentially like a study guide and is un-encyclopedic, and none of the content looks like it could be easily merged with the GCSE Science page (which itself requires more work after having been nominated for deletion once and kept). Although Science education in England provides better context, the GCSE covers not only England, but also Wales and Northern Ireland, so it's problematic. Argument for keeping the term itself as a "Redirect" rather than a straight "Delete" is that "Triple Science" is indeed a commonly used term that is frequently searched, along with "Combined Science", and without the redirect, it's possible someone might attempt to create this article as a standalone yet again, not realising that the GCSE Science article exists, and that is really where any editors wishing to expand content should be directing their attention. For now. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:39, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Agreed, that is a good redir target. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.