Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trishana Gurung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:53, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Trishana Gurung

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of reliable sources. I did't find any media coverage about the article's subject which can establish notability. --Gazal world (talk) 22:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Trishana Gurung is a most famous Singer. Bhupendra Shrestha (talk) 04:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


 * keep - i have added few references to prove her notability.. lot more can be found on web also her name is ‘Trishna Gurung’ not Trishana remove extra ‘a’ from her name  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khagendrawiki (talk • contribs) 16:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)  — Khagendrawiki (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. I've searched the artiste's name with both spellings, and there's still no evidence of notability as set out at WP:MUSICBIO. Media coverage seems to be confined to press releases and interviews. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftifying if not possible to keep article can be draftified where i can give my time and re edit this article .This article is made poorly and references are not provided properly . Khagendrawiki (talk) 07:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No effective referencing.   scope_creep Talk  11:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Substantial articles in national publications . Some enormous numbers for a musician in such a small country : 6m views for a video, 142k likes on Facebook. There appears to be substantial coverage in national Nepali language media but I can't read it so can't be sure. I haven't managed to find Nepali charts or gold record lists in English, but it seems likely with those numbers Gurung would have passed criteria 2 and 3 in WP:Music.  and  seem to suggest she passes criteria 11. --  haminoon  ( talk ) 06:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * and 21m views on this song of her [] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.199.205.50 (talk • contribs)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as has significant coverage in reliable sources such as The Khatmundu Post linked in this discussion by Haminoon, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. The sources currently cited in the article demonstrate notability under both the broad principles of WP:GNG and the specific criteria in WP:MUSICBIO. The Khatmundu Post and My City are both clearly reliable sources that are independent of the subject—and there is non-trivial coverage in each. By the same token, she satisfies criterion one of MUSICBIO, as she is "the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." In answer to ~dom Kaos~, neither of the aforementioned sources are press releases, and nowhere does it say that interviews are not both "non-trivial" and "independent" (be careful not to confuse publication of an interview in an independent publication with the unrelated warning against "publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves" in MUSICBIO). I'm not convinced this is even an edge case—the article may suck, but the subject is notable. —Kilopylae (talk) 11:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per keep arguments above, has enough coverage in reliable secondary sources to pass GNG. Just. Spiderone  11:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.