Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan & Isolde


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro 02:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Tristan & Isolde
The article on Tristan makes this one redundant. Nightscream 03:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge with Tristan and Tristan und Isolde. Notable story/film, and notable spelling.  Might be okay to let this article be about film adaptations since Tristan und Isolde is already so long.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 04:29Z 


 * Strong Keep. The romance, the character, and the opera are three discrete matters; combining them in any combination would be like saying "Camelot," "Morte D'Arthur," and King Arthur shouldn't have separate articles. Monicasdude 04:39, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Concur. From cursory looking at those three articles it seemed like Tristan talked about everything, not just the character; Tristan und isolde talked about everything, not just the opera; etc.  I just meant some refactoring is needed.   &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 04:59Z 
 * Keep as per Monicasdude Calsicol 15:53, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep a popular play in Cornwall with a slightly different spelling Tristan & Yseult. --Pfafrich 00:50, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Monicasdude ArgentiumOutlaw 04:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.