Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Dare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 21:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Tristan Dare

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Not notable in reliable sources Cynof  G  avuf 11:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:48, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee //  have a cup  //  flagged revs now!  // 11:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 00:19, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, the websites might be notable, but I don't think the hoaxer is. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete not enough evidence that this is a single anon hoax artist. refs are not very substantial. anyone could call themselves this now. i would wait to see if any more hoaxes reach notability. seems self promoting.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There's international news coverage including the NYT which seems ample to establish notability. Note also that the AFD is broken - there's no tag. no discussion on the talk page, no search has been done. Relisting this three times without checking out the basics of the nomination is poor.  Please see our deletion process and speedily close nominations which do not satisfy it rather than cluttering up AFD with half-baked drive-bys.  Colonel Warden (talk) 08:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: and merge relevant content to the Radovan Karadžić and Scarlett Johanssen articles. I'm with Mercurywoodrose; there's no genuine evidence this isn't some copycat name, and I can't see that this hoaxer - even if it is the same fellow - is notable beyond his interaction with the other subjects.    RGTraynor  14:01, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.