Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan King (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Tristan King
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:N, WP:ATHLETE, and WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE. Seemed to be a misunderstanding last time this article was nominated, as the only keep argument came in the form of King having played U-18 which is NOT the highest level of amateur hockey. That would be the Olympics or the World Championships. – Nurmsook!  talk...  08:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete per my initial reasoning at the original AfD. It has been pointed out to me that I was incorrect in withdrawing it. Therefore any "It has already been kept" arguments are moot. --Smashvilletalk 18:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions.   —–  Nurmsook!  talk...  18:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as he fails to meet WP:ATHLETE. Probably shouldn't have been withdrawn last time as mentioned by the previous nominator.-Djsasso (talk) 18:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ATHLETE. The highest amateur criteria (which THE U18 tourney IS NOT) comes into affect in the absence of any professional competition in the sport. There's no absence of professional hockey. He's not on any radar as a top prospect either ccwaters (talk) 20:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, article can be recreated when subject fulfill notability guidelines. —Krm500 (Communicate!) 21:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per above.  Patken4 (talk) 01:26, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.