Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Walker (entrepreneur)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  07:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Tristan Walker (entrepreneur)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested CSD, has several notable sources but article does read promotional. Procedural route to AfD. Tawker (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Tawker (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Hi there - I removed a couple of moments of quotations that might have been read as promotional. There's a ton of reputable sources about this person and the research done here was comprehensive, not just cherrypicking positive things. It's an account of the things he's done in his career. BubbleBub (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've opened three sources, all substantive features, from USA Today, NPR and CNBC, and this is obviously a notable subject from what I'm seeing. Easily meets WP:GNG. If it's promotional, rewrite, but there's plenty to work with here. Tony Fox (arf!) 03:19, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * What's the latest here? We can wait another week and then I'll remove template? If you think it'd be helpful, Tawker, maybe we could cross-post the discussion a couple other places? BubbleBub (talk) 05:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep if there are several sources that establish notability, as the nominator suggests, then the article should be rewritten to be less promotional, not deleted. NemesisAT (talk) 11:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article would benefit from some editing, but that does not change the fact that the subject is notable. The amount of sigcov is not trivial. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 16:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.