Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristram Jones-Parry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus on sourcing alone makes this a clear Keep (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 22:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Tristram Jones-Parry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Minor kerfuffle with the government is unnoteworthy. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. We have held in the past that headmasters of major public schools such as Westminster should be considered notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: it certainly seems that quite a number of those listed at Westminster School have articles about them, although I haven't checked how many are notable for other reasons. --Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 20:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Same reason. GooglerW (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as educational activist. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC).
 * Keep. There is enough for WP:GNG on this subject in major UK WP:RS: BBC, Times, Telegraph, Telegraph. He is also referenced in books. Britishfinance (talk) 14:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep job and sourcing = keep.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. a notable headmaster Alex-h (talk) 21:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.