Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triumphant Institute of Management Education (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkdw talk 19:54, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Triumphant Institute of Management Education
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No secondary reliable source, only present here as an unencyclopedic promotional material Solomon7968 (talk) 17:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Once again, I have no idea how this passed the first AfD. There are no sources given and no significant coverage to be found; all I'm finding are links on commercial and social media sites. More promotional rubbish. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:53, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just saw the earlier AfD page, where one of the comments says that this is a coaching institute and hence doesnt merit an article. Wiki has a page for Princeton Review which is also a testprep company. This one is a popular company in India and definitely deserves a page. "Promotional Rubbish' which MezzoMezzo refers to above - is basic info about what the company does and the scale of it. It is similar to carrying info on revenues and no. of employees, operational locations etc. If wiki doesnt like to carry info like this, it should remove the pages of all 'companies' as a policy - and I know that doesnt make sense!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.79.44.250 (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The tone used in the article is quite obviously promotional. Furthermore, for your statement of "If wiki doesnt like to carry info like this, it should remove the pages of all 'companies' as a policy", see WP:OTHERSTUFF. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 00:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  00:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. While I apreciate the endeavour for a thorough discussion, one liners and opinions seen to be ruling the roost. I looked at this page this way - when people search wiki for this company, it not being available there is not appropriate for the following reasons 1. It is one of the top test-prep companies in India. 2. Its opinions are frequently quoted by the India media on entrance exam related discussions. 3. The turn over is $40-50 million, cannot call it to be non-notable. If we have issues, with the page, we should work towards re-writing it but not deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hairama44 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, and even if it were, the article would need a fundamental re-writing to make it encyclopedic. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 00:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant advert. lacks quality third party sources. LibStar (talk) 00:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, Not a notable institute. The page is created for marketing purpose. Strongly recommend to delete this page.Jussychoulex (talk) 03:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.