Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triunfo Pass


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn; no other arguments for deletion. (non-admin closure)  Gongshow  Talk 00:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Triunfo Pass

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not sure of notability. Very short with little context Cssiitcic (talk) 02:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, per WP:NGEO: "Named geographic features are usually considered notable." I agree that the current article gives little context.  There may be a good article to be written on the subject, though: Triunfo Pass is probably notable as the location of a controversial domestic satellite station that received significant news coverage  and maybe notable as a significant named location for hikers and naturalists, with lots of book references  including a 1959 UCLA publication called Geology of the Triunfo Pass Area, Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, California (no preview available, unfortunately). --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep; per WP:NGEO. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Withrdraw- I withdraw my nomination.-Cssiitcic (talk) 18:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.