Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trivaeo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 00:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Trivaeo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This seems to be a quite subtle piece of spam. As the article states, Trivaeo is a word invented by the founder of Trivaeo Limited. So it's a neologism that then advertises. pablo hablo. 22:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable neologism & advert pablo hablo. 22:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

The methodology and approach were created prior to the company. I am a strong advocate of the approach as it brings the business process to a very common level which actually forces business leaders to see that the greater part of all process is the same and only minor adjustments are needed to successfully impliment a BPO solution or automate a business process. DMOSS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mossdw (talk • contribs) 23:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&hs=pLV&q=trivaeo&start=30&sa=N
 * Ddawkins73 (talk) 08:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NEO and WP:ADVERT - a look at Google confirms that this termis only in use in connection with this company and its products. JohnCD (talk) 16:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable neologism and sneaky advertising.Yobmod (talk) 13:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment No doubt it's a neologism. The word's creator left me an interesting message. He fails to realise that the "valid approach" is irrelevant - he hasn't managed to make the word notable. That is, almost no-one's using it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddawkins73 (talk • contribs) 11:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.