Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triviatown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  02:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Triviatown

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A film that does not appear to pass WP:NFILM. Its only claim to notability is winning a few non-notable awards. None of the individuals involved in its creation are notable themselves, so there are no viable redirect targets. I was unable to find a single review from a reliable source upon multiple searches, but I decided to bring it to AFD rather than PRODing it, in case someone else is able to have any better luck in locating any coverage or reviews. Rorshacma (talk) 00:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 00:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: I couldn't find much of anything, myself. A review here, but it's not from a reliable source. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.