Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triway High School (Wooster, Ohio)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge to Wooster, Ohio. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-26 09:36Z 

Triway High School (Wooster, Ohio)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable school, one of many schools added by same user without any sort of notability asserted. Seinfreak37 15:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and Merge pertinent information to Wooster, Ohio per WP:ORG and/or WP:SCHOOLS3. — PSUMark2006   talk  |  contribs  17:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Wooster, Ohio. It's unfortunate that the nominator didn't just perform the merge him/herself and saved everybody a bunch of edits. &mdash; RJH (talk) 18:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete In each case these are the only high schools in the district, which help to judge the articles and should have been mentioned. DGG 20:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * KEEP. Nominator could have saved even more time by not nominating in the first place.EagleFan 21:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * comment Perhaps the authors of such articles could accomplish more if they initially wrote the material as a section of a more appropriate article--the school district if relevant, or the town or county? Having them do the work to create, and then having it deleted here must not be very satisfying — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 01:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Children, let's not waste time blaming each other for wasting our time ;-). please refer to my comments at Articles for deletion/Lake High School (Millbury, Ohio). Ohconfucius 07:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * But do be insulting to other wikipedians? Hmm... &mdash; RJH (talk) 20:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. (a) The article is inadequately reference/sourced, and (b) the article was created by someone who has been going along creating schools articles on a regular basis without then asserting or demonstrating notability. I don't have a problem with individual articles being created and then giving them time to grow, but this particular article is part of a whole group, many of which display the same pernicious pattern. It would be better for EagleFan to create articles on one school at a time, and work on them till they meet our standards, rather than simply impose his preference for inadequately documented schools articles on the project as a whole. As Wikipedia editors we all surely want high quality articles: we are not well-served by the bulk creation of low quality articles. WMMartin 14:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   -- Noroton 16:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Wooster, Ohio. If more information about the school becomes available later, it can be split back out to a separate article. --Elonka 22:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.